Review, revision and proofreading services

Choose the quality check that matches the risk.

These services are often used as if they were interchangeable. They are not. DEMA separates subject-matter review, bilingual revision and final target-language proofreading so the right person checks the right thing at the right stage.

Three services, three questions Review: does it work for the subject?

Revision: is the translation correct against the source?

Proofreading: is the final target text clean and publishable?

The difference

Do not pay for the wrong check or skip the one you actually need.

Three simple questions decide which check you need. The comparison below makes that decision practical for procurement, project managers and internal reviewers.

Service Main question What is checked Typical reviewer
Review Does the content meet its intended purpose? Subject-matter appropriateness, domain terminology, client conventions, usability in context. Subject-matter expert, in-country specialist or client reviewer.
Revision Is the translation accurate against the source? Meaning, omissions/additions, terminology, consistency, factual correspondence and target-language quality. Qualified bilingual reviser.
Proofreading Is the final target text ready to publish? Grammar, spelling, punctuation, typographical problems, formatting and final presentation. Target-language proofreader/editor.
Where each step sits

Quality is a sequence, not a single final glance.

Depending on the project, DEMA can apply one layer or combine several. A regulated manual may need bilingual revision and client technical review; a translated brochure may then need DTP proofreading after layout.

01

Translate or prepare the target content

The first target version is created through the appropriate human or MTPE workflow.

02

Revise against the source

A second qualified linguist checks whether the target accurately carries the source content and terminology.

03

Apply subject-matter review where needed

A domain specialist or client-side reviewer checks intended use, product language or local conventions.

04

Finalize the document

Corrections are incorporated into the target and, in recurring programmes, into the translation memory or glossary where appropriate.

05

Proofread the publishable version

The final target document is checked for language and presentation problems introduced during editing or layout.

What we check

Concrete quality criteria instead of a generic “high quality” label.

Every quality claim we make is tied to a specific check. The exact checklist varies by file and content type.

Linguistic accuracy

Meaning and target-language correctness.

• Omissions/additions
• Grammar and syntax
• Register and fluency

Terminology & consistency

Correct use of approved vocabulary.

• Glossary compliance
• Consistent repeated sentences
• Product and legal terminology

Hard-data integrity

Items where small errors can have large consequences.

• Numbers and dates
• Units and symbols
• Tags and placeholders

Publication quality

Problems visible only in the final format.

• Typography
• Line breaks and overset
• Punctuation and page-level consistency
When an internal review team is involved

Your experts should correct once, not repeat the same feedback every release.

For recurring documentation, your engineers, dealers, legal teams or in-country reviewers can be built into the review step, and approved corrections land in your translation memory and glossary instead of staying in email threads.

Review closer to the source

The person who knows the product can work on the segment that matters instead of reconstructing context from an exported document.

Reusable corrections

Validated terminology and recurring edits can become part of future releases.

Visible responsibility

The workflow makes it clearer whether a change is linguistic, technical, stylistic or local-market specific.

Typical use cases

Quality checks are most valuable where publication, safety or reputation makes rework expensive.

Technical manuals Legal documents Financial reports Marketing collateral Web content Product catalogues User interfaces Subtitles Accessible documents Sworn/certified documents
Client voices

Long-term partners, in their own words.

Manufacturers, agencies and specialist firms across Europe rely on us for documentation that has to be right in every market.

Questions about quality checks

The right service depends on what you already have.

Can you revise a translation produced by another supplier?

Yes. DEMA can work on existing target content, but the scope should be defined: source comparison, terminology review, subject-matter review or final proofreading.

Is proofreading enough for a high-risk translation?

Proofreading checks the target text but does not necessarily compare it to the source. For high-risk material, bilingual revision may be required before final proofreading.

Can our internal expert be the reviewer?

Yes. In recurring workflows, internal subject-matter experts can be integrated into the review path, especially when product or local-market terminology requires client approval.

Will corrections update our translation memory?

Where the project uses a maintained TM, approved changes should be incorporated so future content does not repeat the same issue.

Define the risk before you define the review step.

Send the source, target and intended publication context. We can identify whether you need review, revision, proofreading or a combination, and where that check belongs in the workflow.

Talk to DEMA

How can we help?

Tell us what you need and we’ll get back to you with the solutions.