← All case studies
Case study: technical documentation for an industrial equipment manufacturer
Making multilingual documentation a formality, not a shipment risk.
This Italian manufacturer exports the large majority of what it builds. We built a standing multilingual documentation process that keeps technical content consistent, print-ready and responsive, even when delivery timelines tighten.
Manufacturing · Technical documentation
An Italian industrial equipment manufacturer
Global
most of its production ships abroad
One partner
for translation, terminology and DTP
Ongoing
client-specific linguistic assets
Priority route
for urgent requests
The operating context
For an export manufacturer, documentation is part of the delivery.
The client designs and builds industrial systems and exports most of its production. Every machine carries a multilingual documentation requirement with it: operating and maintenance manuals, safety information, interface text and other supporting material have to be ready for the destination market.
That language work does not happen in isolation. Technical content can keep changing close to shipment, while new machines often reuse large parts of previous configurations. The process has to absorb both change and repetition without asking engineering or sales to rebuild the language workflow for every order.
The challenge
The real problem was not translating manuals. It was keeping language off the critical path.
Each machine leaves with a documentation set that has to be ready for its destination market. When source content is still changing close to shipment, translation cannot become a separate bottleneck.
Consistency also has to survive across machine variants, interface text, spare-parts content and years of documentation. The client needed a process that did not require engineering or sales to coordinate language suppliers job by job.
Why it was complex
The documentation changes, but the knowledge should not reset.
The challenge was to make every new project benefit from the technical decisions already made in earlier ones, while still keeping pace with late revisions and urgent delivery dates.
01
A moving source
Engineering documentation can keep evolving until close to shipment. Translation has to accommodate revisions without losing control of terminology or version consistency.
02
Machine variants reuse knowledge
New systems are often configurations of an existing platform. Previously translated content should become reusable technical memory, not an expense repeated from zero.
03
Terminology has operational consequences
Component names and process terms need to stay aligned across manuals, interface text and supporting documentation. Inconsistent wording confuses users and service teams.
04
Layout is part of the deliverable
Technical documents contain structured layouts, illustrations and callouts. Returning only translated text would push production work back onto the client.
05
Urgency cannot be exceptional
Orders may close late while the shipment date stays fixed. The language process needs a route for short-notice work instead of relying on favours.
06
Knowledge must survive over time
A stable team, translation memory and termbase let decisions persist across years of documentation instead of depending on individual memory.
Your business
Does this look like your documentation workflow?
If two or more of these sound familiar, the operating model in this case is relevant to your business.
Manuals keep changing close to release or shipment.
Large parts of each new document repeat content that was translated before.
Terminology has to stay identical across manuals, interfaces and spare-parts content.
Engineering or sales still spends time coordinating translation, review or layout.
The approach
Turn recurring documentation into a managed system.
01
Single point of contact
One dedicated project manager receives requests across languages and formats, so the client never coordinates multiple suppliers.
02
Client-specific translation memory
Legacy documentation is reused, so recurring text in machine variants is recognised instead of translated from zero each time.
03
Approved terminology
A client glossary keeps component and process terminology consistent across documentation and over time.
04
Stable specialist teams
The same linguists work on the same product families, so technical decisions stay consistent from project to project.
05
In-house multilingual DTP
Files come back in their intended layout, not as loose translated text the client has to rebuild.
06
Urgent-work route
Short-notice requests follow a defined route, so documentation keeps pace with orders that close late.
The result
A recurring translation issue became an operational formality.
Technical terminology is managed as a reusable asset instead of being decided again on every job.
Documentation moves from source file to multilingual, laid-out output through one managed process.
Engineering and sales no longer orchestrate language and layout suppliers for each delivery.
From this case to your workflow
The client story is one example. The operating model should fit your business.
This is a technical-documentation case. For a company with a similar continuous documentation programme, TUBE is the closest DEMA solution: the complete workflow, set up by our team, with your glossary and translation memory controlling machine translation.
DEMA solution · Closest fit
TUBE
Best suited to continuous technical-documentation programmes with frequent releases and recurring content: your glossary and translation memory control machine translation.
Explore TUBE →
DEMA managed service
Managed technical documentation
A dedicated DEMA workflow combining specialist linguists, terminology, translation memory, DTP and urgent-project handling around your recurring technical documentation.
Discuss your workflow →
Client perspective
“Our collaboration with DEMA has made it possible for us to look at the translation issue as nothing more than a formality… they are an attentive, reliable partner who responds quickly to our needs, even in emergency situations.”
Client feedback, Italian industrial equipment manufacturer
Business impact
What changed beyond the individual project.
For a manufacturer that depends heavily on exports, the value is predictability. Multilingual documentation becomes a repeatable operating capability instead of a last-minute project attached to each machine.
The accumulated translation memory and terminology also change the economics of future work: recurring content and established technical decisions are reused instead of recreated, so the language process becomes more efficient as the documentation history grows.
Most importantly, engineering and sales stay focused on machines and customers. Coordinating languages, terminology, revision and layout sits inside a managed workflow, not on internal teams at shipment time.
More case studies
See how other teams work with us.
Marketing collateral · Translation + DTP
An Italian manufacturer’s marketing team
From translated copy to print-ready multilingual brochures.
Read case study →
Fashion retail · Content governance
A multi-brand fashion retail group
One multilingual operating model across brands, departments and content types.
Read case study →
Cosmetics · Specialist content
A cosmetics manufacturer
Keeping cosmetics content accurate, market-ready and on schedule.
Read case study →
FAQ
Questions about our case studies.
Are these real client projects?
Yes. Each case study describes a real client relationship. We anonymise client names and identifying details to protect their confidentiality.
Can you set up a similar workflow for us?
Yes. We start from how you work today: what you translate, who is involved and where the process slows down. Then we propose the approach that fits, whether that is TUBE for continuous documentation or project-based translation managed by our team.
How do we get started?
Tell us about your content, languages and deadlines using the form on this page. Our team will get back to you within one business day.
Choose the right operating model
Turn the lesson from these cases into a workflow that fits your business.
Tell us what you translate, who is involved, where the process slows down and what must become more predictable. We will map whether TUBE or project-based translation managed by our team is the better fit.
How can we help?
Tell us what you need and we’ll get back to you with the solutions.
Insights
Related reading.
Practical articles from our blog on the topics behind this page.
All articles →